Saturday, July 23, 2011

I Am Legend: A Comparative Study Part 2

Richard Matheson's I Am Legend (Graphic Novel), a 1954 novel written by Richard Matheson
The Last Man on Earth, a 1964 movie staring Boris Karlof; written by William F. Leicester, with screenplay by Richard Matheson (as Logan Swanson), Furio M. Monetti, and Ubaldo B. Ragona

The Omega Man, a 1971 movie staring Charlton Heston; Screenplay by John William Corrington & Joyce Hooper Corrington, based on the novel by Richard Matheson.
I Am Legend, a 2007 movie staring Will Smith; written by Mark Protosevich, Akiva Goldsman, based on the novel by Richard Matheson.

Part 2. Curing Versus Killing

In this section we will take a closer look at the protagonist, Robert Neville, and the antagonists, the infected humans, the virus, and human nature. We will look at Robert’s attitude and his actions toward these forces and analyze how they reflect the shifting views of society and address the struggle between science and superstition.
Who are the Monsters?

In order to understand the conflicting ideas set forth in the 1954 novel, I Am Legend, and the 1964 movie, Last Man on Earth, we need to understand a bit of the historical context which affects these versions. In an article for World of Tech News, Tamsin Oxford calls the decade of the 1950s a time of “dramatic [technological] evolution.” It was during this post-World War II time period that the “technology that had only been postulated and pondered was suddenly becoming reality.” The first microchip/ integrated circuit and the first stored program computer were developed. The 1950s also saw a boon in medicine. “Important Advances in Medicine During the 1950s” calls this time period, “Truly,… a turning point in modern medicine.” The synthesis of Penicillin “sparked the gold era of antibiotics”, but within four years doctors learned that bacteria could develop resistance to the new wonder drug of antibiotics. Thus the term “superbug” was first coined.
Any leap in scientific knowledge leads to a corresponding leap in fear of the consequences, so it not surprising that in these two versions of the story, humans have been infected by a germ that cannot be killed by antibiotics. Humans who don’t die from the virus, develop vampire-like qualities. In I Am Legend (1954) and Last Man on Earth (1964), the infected humans, like vampires, are repulsed by fresh garlic, mirrors and crosses, and only be killed with a stake through the heart. However, unlike traditional vampires, who are often suave and savvy, these mutations are virtually brain dead. They are driven to kill, however we do not see them drinking blood in either story. In both the novel and the first movie version, Last Man on Earth, the mutated creatures move like traditional zombies, all stiff-limbed and slow. They are unorganized and seem to be driven by pure instinct. These creatures do not inspire fear. They don’t have any supernatural abilities, such as turning into bats, they aren’t abnormally strong and they can’t even break into a poorly boarded house. But using the vampire motif allows the theme of science versus superstition to be prominent. It sets up a contrast between superstitious folklore and Robert’s pursuit of understanding through analysis. By extension, it sets the stage for question of who are the real monsters.
In the novel, I Am Legend (1954), Robert is a self-declared “unscientific” man who reads books about vampire mythology and compares it the reality of their being. He questions, “Is the vampire so bad?” He compares the evil of the vampire to the evil deeds of parents draining the spirit of their children until they become neurotic politicians. “Why do you wish him destroyed? ... [they have] no means of support…no measures for education…no voting franchise (I Am Legend, 1954).” By pointing to these specific skills, the novel shapes what is important in society: supporting yourself, educating your children, and participating in a cooperative government. The vampire, lacking these skills, is no real threat; he is simply another vermin to be exterminated. In Last Man on Earth, Vincent Price’s version of Robert says, “Reason is the only advantage I have over them… I must find where they hide during the day.” So in the novel and in Last Man on Earth, Robert hunts the vampires every day with a singular mindset, searching for their daytime hiding places, driving a stake through their heart, and taking their bodies to the pits for burning the dead which had been set up by the military before civilization collapsed. Robert even notices that he finds more bodies every day and thinks, “They live off the weak ones and leave them for the pit.” Yet he is unsatisfied with their slow demise and speeds their extinction by hunting them. In the novel, Robert says that, “Morality has fallen with society,” making a weak rationale for killing the infected randomly.
In both of these versions of the story we see the stark loneliness which has taken a toll on Robert over the past three years. His desire for companionship is intensified when he sees a dog that has survived the infection and “to his complete astonishment, he found himself offering up a stumbling prayer that the dog would be protected. It was a moment in which he found a desperate need to believe in a god that shepparded his own creations. But even praying, he felt a twinge of self-reproach and he knew might start mocking his own prayer at any second (I Am Legend, 1954).” The dog comes back later that day, which gives Robert a feeling of joy and normality. He ponders that if a dog can survive and learn to hide itself from the dangers in the night, surely if a human who could think could survive. However, he immediately stops himself, because “hope is dangerous.” Here is the obvious rejection of, not only religion and faith as objects of superstition, but hope which the rational mind cannot accept. Indeed, Robert’s rejection of hope is justified in these stories when he finally coaxes the dog into his home, only to discover the dog is infected after all. In Last Man on Earth, Robert takes the only logical course of action: he kills the dog. However, in the 1954 novel, I Am Legend, Robert desperately tries without success to cure the animal.

Robert reaches a new level of depression after losing the dog and realizes that “intense hope is not the answer and never had been. In a world of monotonous horror, there could be no salvation in wild dreaming. Horror he had adjusted to, but monotony was the greater obstacle (I Am Legend, 1954).”This statement is reinforcement for rejecting hope as an act of the superstitious mind. Then he sees a woman walking across the field during the day and yells to her. However, she is afraid and runs from him. Robert catches her. She struggles to get away from him, and he reassures her, “I’m not one of them…do you want to come with me or face them?” In both versions the woman’s name is Ruth. Robert takes takes Ruth home and tests her for infection by shoving garlic in her face and forcing her to look at mirrors and crosses. He insists she’s infected, but Ruth denies it. “She cowered in the corner, the way the dog had done.” Robert acknowledges that “if she were like the others, there was only one course open and it was better not to know too much about the people you kill (I Am Legend, 1954).” There is little thought to trying to cure Ruth. Killing is what Robert does best, hence what humanity excels at. Robert questions Ruth about how she survived all this time and she replies that she protected her house with crosses. Robert asks, “Why should a Jew fear the cross,” again questioning, analyzing the power of yet another superstitious believe.

That night Robert makes supper for them, but the creatures are outside his house calling for him to come out. Ruth can’t eat. Robert tells her that “they’re mentally weak, like animals after a long famine (Last Man on Earth, 1964).” Here is the justification; we see that the infected are no longer considered human by the protagonist. They are not only expendable, they are better off dead in these two versions of the story. Robert finally insists on testing Ruth’s blood. If she has the germ, he swears he will cures her, much in the same way he swears he will cure the dog. But as Robert checks her blood sample on the slide, “He doesn’t realize that his breath has stopped. His blank eyes met hers.(Last Man on Earth, 1964).” Ruth hits him in the head with a mallet three times until he is unconscious. She admits that she has medicine which prevents her from becoming a mindless creature of the night and that she is not alone. There is now a distinction between the “living dead” and the walking dead. There is an entire community of these “living dead” and, not only are they organized, they “may have to kill [Robert] and those like [him] (I Am Legend, 1954).” In the movie, Last Man on Earth, Ruth explains that since Robert has been killing members of their community along with the walking dead, he can’t join them because he’s “a monster to them.” In fact, she was sent to distract Robert so he could be captured. The live vampires come for him that night and Robert watches as the live vampires attack and kill the walking dead. Ironically, Robert is horrified by the way these new vampires slaughter the dead ones and he wonders if “this is the new society.” He feels more compassion for the vampires he has been killing all these years than for the ones rebuilding society. In I Am Legend (1954), Robert is injured and they capture him for execution. Robert finally makes the connection that “this is what they must have felt like when the pipe went into them,” and says to Ruth, “Did you see their faces when they killed?... Joy. Pure joy.” She reminds him that he had the same look on his face when he killed the vampires. “I’m the abnormal one now,” Robert realizes when he is taken out for his execution. Normal was a majority concept. He takes the pills Ruth gave him and as he dies, thinks, “I am legend.” In the movie, Last Man on Earth, Robert tries to escape from the living vampires. He hides in a church, but he is found and killed with a spike through his chest. Robert realizes at last that “they’re afraid of me.” As he dies, a baby cries and Ruth comforts it, saying, “Don’t cry…we’re all safe now.” The living vampires slowly leave the church.
The logical, rational human loses to the mythological vampire who is now the norm. There is an implication that if logic is conquered, then the superstition of hope may return, along with vampires and faith and all the other concepts which operate outside of investigation and logical deduction. In these versions, it is the analytic human who is the monster, the dangerous beast in the day who murders without concern for the victim. But then murder is also the norm for the new subspecies of humans … those “living vampires” … for they also kill with joy and have founded a society which justifies violence and murder. When we look at this, we realize that human society or any offshoot of it, whether superstitious or scientific, results in the same end: destruction.

Plague: The Great Equalizer




By the 1971 movie, Omega Man, the vampire motif is been replaced by the infected having symptoms of high fever, followed by loss of pigmentation in the skin, hair and eyes, extreme light sensitivity, insanity, and they can be killed like any other human. Even though they also attack Charlton Heston’s version of Robert every night, they do not inspire any more fear than the infected in the 1954 novel, I Am Legend, or the 1964 movie, Last Man on Earth. The all-white humans dress in black medieval robes with hoods and spurn all modern technology, blaming it for causing the plague. In this version of the story the infected show the ability to think and plan clearly as an organized group, much like the “living vampires” in the previous versions. They call themselves “the Family” and are led by the ex-reporter, Mathias. It is Mathias who says, “A scientist is a man who understood nothing until there was nothing left to understand.” The statement clearly shows the layman’s distrust of scientific advances which can open Pandora’s Box. In this version, superstition is the abstract fear of technology instead of the concrete fear embodied by the vampire. The use of black hooded robes and the anti-science attitude is an open comparison to the Medieval Inquest and witch hunts where scientists, like Copernicus, were excommunicated by the church for advancing scientific theories based on observation.

The use of the Inquest sets up a metaphor for McCarthyism, which in 1937 established the Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) to investigate subversive activities. The HUAC interrogated and black-listed many artist and writers who were suspected of being communist because they expressed ideas which conflicted with the conservative government of the time. By 1947 this committee had turned its attention to the Hollywood Motion Picture Industry and began investigations into any questionable associations which actors, directors and film makers had. It was, in essence an Inquest based on the fear of communism. These investigations were still a source of contention for many actors, writers and directors throughout the decades of the 1950s and 60s. The 1960s were also a time of growing awareness of the social inequalities imposed on people of color and women. HUAC was supported in their activities by the white supremacy group, the Klu Kluz Klan, in a telegram which stated, “Every true American, and that includes every Klansman, is behind you and your committee in its effort to turn the country back to the honest, freedom-loving, God-fearing American to whom it belongs.” This statement implies that those honest, freedom-loving, God-fearing American are white. So it not surprising that one of the symptoms of the plague in the 1971 version is to turn everyone white. Black, red, yellow and all shades in between are turned white with albino-like effectiveness. Plus, if these infected display symptoms of insanity, it is the most uniform and consistent form of insanity in the history of the human race. All of the infected believe and act the same: they spurn modern inventions and their weapons are fire and catapults, which they turn on any person who is not like them. Thus white supremacy becomes synonymous with illness and backwards thinking.
However, Omega Man’s protagonist, Charlton Heston’s version of Robert, is not an innocent man under attack by a mindless mob like in I Am Legend (1954) or Last Man on Earth (1964). Robert is a military doctor who was searching for an antidote for the germ warfare which infected the planet and led to the complete collapse of civilization, but we don’t see the continuous battle for an antidote or the use of the scientific method during Omega Man, nor do we see the methodical search for the daytime lair of the infected. This Robert may not search out the daytime lair of the infected to murder them in their sleep, but he is more than willing to kill them on sight. Within the first few minutes of the movie we see Heston driving down the road in a convertible listening, ironically, to “A Summer Place”, a love ballad about a place where you can be “safe and warm…and my heart is free from all care”. He stops suddenly when he sees the flash of a black robe in a second-story window and fires his machine gun at person. Heston’s Robert begins driving again and crashes into some debris when he takes a corner too fast. His first line is, “There’s never a cop around when you need one.” When he takes a new car from a nearby dealership, he asks the corpse of the salesman how much he’d take on a trade in, then says, “Thanks, you cheating bastard.” These two statements show that civilization was not necessarily a good thing. There were problems with the government in the form of government’s willingness to use biological weapons, lagging police service, and greed in business transactions. There is cynical acceptance of civilization’s end in this 1971 version, as if humanity has gotten what it deserves. Here the attitude is one of surrender. Since he can’t beat the disease, he might as well kill the host if it’s not too much work. It’s an attitude akin to throwing the baby out with the bathwater and it shows that 20th century man must bend to the will of nature and make the best of the hand he��s dealt. So Robert drives his new car to the local theater where he watches footage from the 1969 Woodstock: 3 Days of Peace & Music Director's Cut (40th Anniversary Two-Disc Special Edition), which was billed as "An Aquarian Exposition: 3 Days of Peace & Music". The 1960s were a turbulent time for Americans, who felt somehow lost or cheated after the widely televised assignation of President John F. Kennedy. Woodstock allowed many of the disillusioned teens of the period who were experiencing “the generation gap” to express their independence from the conservative ideas of their parents. Many of the bands who played at Woodstock voiced rejections of those conservative ideas by performing music which protested the Vietnam Conflict. President Lyndon B. Johnson had sent American ground troops to Vietnam in 1965, escalating the conflict. Young men were drafted to serve in the military to fight a war they didn’t understand and didn’t believe America had a right to be involved in. Some of those young men escaped the draft by running to Canada and some proclaimed they were conscientious objectors and refused to fight. So this clip of Woodstock footage works well with the anti-war ideas which dominated the hippie generation’s lack of trust in the government.
Charlton Hester’s version of Robert also finds a woman, a man, and a group of children who, though they are infected by the virus, are more resistant to it. They are in the early stages of the infection and only one is showing symptoms. In Omega Man the woman, Lisa, is African-American and Robert has an affair with her thus promoting the ideas of desegregation which dominated the 1960s, due in large part to civil rights activists like Martin Luther King, Jr. Mr. King encouraged non-violent protest and boycotts which desegregated buses, drinking fountains, and bathrooms in the South. Even though Mr. King endorsed non-violence, his opponents didn’t. In 1968 he was assassinated. The year before he was assassinated, Hollywood responded to the social changes by producing the movie Guess Who's Coming to Dinner. This movie was controversial because it featured a racially mixed couple. The young white woman in the movie is blind and often neglected by her parents. She meets a kind African-American man in the park and they strike up a friendship. When her parent’s discover she’s friends with a black man, they become abusive and insist that she no longer see him. But she rebels against her parents, refusing give up her new-found friend. In light of these events, it is not surprising that Omega Man features a mixed race couple in an attempt to keep up with the social changes. However, there are clumsy attempts at humor between Robert and his black lover about birth control, another controversial topic in the 1960s and 70s.

The band of survivors is hiding in the hills of California. Lisa and Dutch, a former medical student, led this small group of children. The children themselves play an active role in their own protection; the older children carry machine guns and guard the younger ones. The only child who is displaying symptoms is Lisa’s brother, Richie. Meeting Lisa and the other survivors stimulates Robert’s desire to find a cure for the plague in order to save Ritchie. Suddenly he realizes that he can make a antidote from his own blood because he’s immune. Robert and Lisa take Richie back to Robert’s townhouse, where begins and intense effort to synthesize the antidote. Oddly even, Robert finds the antidote and begins Richie on his road to recovery. At this point we have to ask what Robert was thinking for the past three years. He could have cured a lot of people in that time, yet he didn’t. This is evidence that Robert had given up all hope for helping humanity, which is perhaps a reflection of the original story’s aversion to hope as a form of superstition. It is during this attempt to cure Richie that we see another reference to race. Robert draws his own blood and Lisa asks if one bottle will be enough. Robert says, “It’s 100% Anglo-Saxon blood,” an ironic reference since he’s using this “superior blood” to cure a young African American boy, who becomes the voice of compassion and hope. As Richie regains his health, he tries to talk Robert into curing Mathias and the Family, but Robert refuses, saying they’re vermin and that is will “cure them or kill them, damn it,” and he gives a little laugh. Oddly enough, Robert says that Richie’s compassion and hope scare him more than Mathias does. Again we see the cynicism of the earlier stories. Hope is dangerous. But Richie is a believer. The antidote has helped him, and in his belief that it will also cure the Family, he goes to Mathias.
Now that Richie is getting well, Lisa and Robert plan to escape the city and take all the survivors someplace safe. While they go to scavenge for necessary supplies, Richie runs away. When Robert returns to the townhouse, he finds a note from Richie saying, “I have to find out who’s right,” and he leaves to try to save Richie from his own naivety. Richie’s takes the risk of facing the Family based on his faith in the possibility of curing the infected, but when he faces Mathias with this cure, Mathias says, “We don’t want to go back to the creatures we were.” This implies that, not only has 20th Century man has lost his humanity through the use of technology, but that close-minded, white-supremacist don’t want to change. “White is right” is thus an illness that cannot be cured with any amount of compassion or hope, and since Mathias kills Richie, close-mindedness kills hope. The scene changes and we see Lisa on her way back to Robert’s townhouse with two bags of groceries. She stops in the shadows of a building as the Family march past saying, “We have to cleanse the world. Outside of the Family, there is nothing.” Lisa drops her bags and removes her scarf. She has “crossed over” and is completely white. She joins them in them to attack Robert’s townhouse. Robert finds Richie dead at the Family’s “nest” and he is attacked with sticks and clubs. He makes it back to his townhouse, but the rooms are dark except for candles. Lisa is there in black robes with a white face and hair. Mathias and the Family are there, too. They restrain Neville while the “entertain” him by destroying his art with knives and breaking everything in the house. Mathias says, “It was all an illusion, a nightmare; your art, your science,” it’s all gone, now we can rebuild. Robert says, “Build coffins. It’s all you’ll need!” Thus there is a direct correlation between the absence of art and science and death. Robert breaks free and grabs Lisa, pulling her out of the townhouse while they are attacked with spears. Robert is hit in the chest with a spear and stumbles into the fountain in front of his townhouse. As he’s dying, Lisa says, “You’re evil, you don’t understand. I’m part of the Family.” So Lisa is absorbed into this all-white community, just as many African-Americans were accused of being “Uncle Toms”. Dutch arrives in the morning with the other children to find Lisa hiding from the sunlight under a bush and Robert dead in the blood-tainted fountain. He takes the bottle of Robert’s blood and pulls Lisa into the car. He says, “Let’s go, kids. We’ve got a long way to go,” leaving behind the last remnant of cynical science and the dying Family of all-white infected, and yes, indeed, civilization has a long way to go.
Lit with Hope in the 21st Century

In I Am Legend, the 2007 movie, infected humans have “devolved” into an animalistic state in which they live in “hives”. The do not talk or reason, but they are such excellent trackers and hunters that Will Smith’s version of Robert must pour ammonia on the sidewalk as he enters his townhouse to prevent them from picking up his scent. His home has thick metal shutters on the doors and windows which bolt from the inside and at night he closes his fortress and sleeps with a gun and his dog in the bathtub. The symptoms of this “krypto virus” include extreme sensitivity to sunlight, elevated temperatures in excess of 200 degrees and increased respiration. The creatures are totally hairless, computer generated images which are able to climb walls, hang from ceilings, jump abnormally high and open their jaws several inches further than normal humans. In short, they are closer to animals than they are to people, and as such generate greater fear in our protagonist when night falls. Even though they are more dangerous and less human than in the other versions of this story, Robert is shown methodically seeking a cure. It is the only version where we see a strong desire to cure rather than kill. Will Smith’s version of Robert only kills the creatures in self-defense. In this version we see the implication that science can help as well as harm, regardless of how far down humanity has devolved.
The methodical approach to analyzing and curing the disease is seen clearly in the 2007 movie version of I Am Legend. Robert is already a doctor working in the military’s version of the Center for Disease Control and he is decidedly trying to cure the infected, not kill them. Just as in the novel and the Karlof movie, Smith’s version of Robert uses a methodical approach to discover the creatures’ daytime lair, gridding a map of the city and marking buildings already searched. Smith however, captures the infected to test trial versions of the antivirus on them. Thus through seeking to cure rather than kill and the lack of corpses in the street, we see that the 21st century society values human life reflected in the 2007 movie. Humans, even devolved ones, have a right to live if possible. In fact, in this version all life is more values. This is seen in the opening scene when Robert is hunting deer. He finally has one in his sites when the deer is brought down by a lioness. Robert pauses and sees a lion and two cubs come up to enjoy the meal which the mother lion has caught. The fact that he cannot bring himself to shoot them shows us two things: 1) that all life is important and 2) that Robert feels some sort of sympathy with this lion family, possibly thinking about his own lost family.
This is the only version in which Robert is portrayed by an African-American doctor who is determined to make the world right. He fights the disease which has mutated humanity continuously and methodically throughout the entire movie. His one true focus is conquering the disease to cure humanity. This shows a definite change in attitude towards science as a tool to help and towards African-Americans, who in the 1950s and 60s were not depicted as professional, caring individuals. Most films during this period used a stereotypic depiction of people of color. It shows how far society has come from the white supremacist attitude. In his desire to cure the infected, Robert must periodically capture one so he can test a new antidote. After Robert accidentally discovers the “hive” of creatures in an abandoned building, he sets a trap for one. When he captures a female as a test subject, one of the males sticks his head out of the dark to scream at him and is consequently burned by the sun. In his notes, Robert says that they have become “completely dissocialized” and claim that the male’s behavior shows that their instinct for self-preservation is deteriorating. It is interesting to note that Smith’s version of Robert does not even consider that the female he captured could be a mate, which would have accounted for a basic instinct to protect and defend her.
The devolved humans show a capacity to plot and plan when they set a trap for Robert. It is a complex plan which involves taking one of Robert’s mannequins from the video store he frequents and putting it in front of their building. They set a camouflaged snare which springs when Robert steps into it, pulling him up by his foot with a noose. He is knocked unconscious when his head hits the pavement, allowing the creatures time for the sun to set. Robert regains consciousness as the sun is setting and cuts himself down, but he falls on a spike and is injured. He doesn’t quite make it to his car before the creatures unleash their own infected dogs to attack him. Robert’s dog, Sam, is bitten before he can kill the dogs and escape. Robert gets Sam back to his lab and injects her with the latest antivirus, but it doesn’t work and so he must kill his four-legged friend. It is at this point that Robert’s attitude changes. He is now bent on killing the creatures and avenging the death of his pet. Robert goes to the hive’s building and waits outside until the sun sets again. Then he runs over as many as he can until they turn his car on its roof and try to grab him front the inside. He is rescued at the last minute by a woman named Anna and the child she cares for.
The theme of science versus superstition is more subtle in the I Am Legend (2007) version, because the superstition is hope and it is not portrayed as the antithesis of logic, but rather a necessary component. We see hope and science tied irrevocably together in Robert’s refusal to give up on finding a cure. We also see it in the automatic radio transmission he has set telling anyone who is uninfected that he will be at the dock at noon every day and that he can provide shelter, food and safety. Hop is associated with faith in god and the rebirth of humanity as shown in many images of the butterfly. We see it in the opening scene as Robert races down the streets of Manhattan past a billboard with a butterfly that says, “God Love Us”. It is the image of his daughter’s fingers interlocked like wings and saying, “Look, Dad, a butterfly,” as he races to get his family out of the plague infected city before its quarantined. It is in the dialogue in which Robert tells Anna about Bob Marley’s idea of injecting love and music into society in order to cure hate. It is verbalized by Anna when she explains that “Gold told me [about the survivor’s colony in Vermont],” and Robert’s insistence that “There is no god.” And finally it is in Robert’s final scene when Anna, Ethan and he are trapped in the isolation chamber and the Dark Seekers hurl themselves against the glass. The glass splinters into the shape of a butterfly and Robert knows that he must give Anna the antivirus in his blood so she can take it to the survivor’s colony. Smith sacrifices himself; you might say injects himself into society, in order to save Anna, Ethan and humanity. They movie ends with Anna and Ethan arriving at the survivor’s colony. The final words in this version are, in 2012 they found a cure due to Robert Neville. “We are his legacy. This is his legend. Light up the darkness,” which is the perfect conclusion to carry home the idea that science, faith, and hope work together.
In all we see a transition from the belief that superstition will overcome logo to superstition and science as co-companions. Either way, I could be write or I could be wrong. Let me know what you think.
I could be write or I could be wrong, either way I'd like to hear from you.

I Am Legend: A Comparative Study Part 3

I Am Legend and the Movies Which Followed It

I Am Legend, a 1954 novel written by Richard Matheson

Last Man on Earth, a 1964 movie staring Boris Karof; written by William F. Leicester, with screenplay by Richard Matheson (as Logan Swanson), Furio M. Monetti, and Ubaldo B. Ragona

Omega Man, a 1971 movie staring Charlton Heston; Screenplay by John William Corrington & Joyce Hooper Corrington, based on the novel by Richard Matheson.

I Am Legend, a 2007 movie starring Will Smith; written by Mark Protosevich, Akiva Goldsman, based on the novel by Richard Matheson.

Part 3: The Changing View of Women

Science fiction often portrays images of a future world that might or could be possible if certain political, scientific, or military conditions persist. These notorious “what if” stories are usually a warning about dire consequences if things don’t change. It might be an obvious warning about greenhouse gases and the effects of global warming, as in The Day After Tomorrow, or it might be a warning about the dangers of overpopulation and food shortages, as in Soylent Green. Sometimes, though, the warnings are about social issues. These are more subtle. In recent years, there have been studies in the metaphorical representation of women, people of color, and homosexuals in fiction, movies, and sitcoms. These metaphoric images often depict them as “others” to beware of. We see this “other-ing” of women in the original 1954 novel, I Am Legend, by Richard Matheson, and we see a change in the portrayal of women through the subsequent movies based on the novel.

The Dangerous Sexuality of Women

One of most striking differences between the 1954 novel, I Am Legend, by Richard Matheson, and the movies which are based on this novel, is the way women are portrayed. Again we must look at the historical context of women’s social role in order to see why women are portrayed differently in each of these stories. First of all, it is important to acknowledge that Judeo-Christian beliefs depict woman as the original temptress through the Biblical story of Adam and Eve. In this Genesis story, Eve, the first woman, tempts Adam to eat from the forbidden Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, thereby causing man’s expulsion from Eden and the ensuing consequences that man must work by the sweat of his brow and that woman must have pain during childbirth. This deeply rooted idea permeates western cultures and shows up in many stories, essays, and sermons, creating a fear of women followed by the necessity to control women as part of a spiritual mandate.

We see the dangers of women quite clearly in I Am Legend (1954). Our main character, Robert, relates how the female vampires are “withering and twisting” to get his attention on several occasions. There is an emphasis on the women who are “enticing him out, tempting him” to come out and be killed. Robert says, “The women were out there…their flesh waiting for his touch.” The sexual implications are undeniable in the novel, for “The lustful, bloodthirsty, naked women flaunting their hot bodies at him… no not hot.” These dangerous, lustful women are contrasted with Robert’s dead wife, Virginia, during the flashbacks in the novel. Virginia is the quintessential wife: meek, mild, submissive to her husband even when she disagrees with him. We see this in the scene when Robert’s daughter, Cathy, becomes infected with the virus. Virginia wants to call a doctor for Cathy, but Robert refuses because Cathy would be quarantined. Virginia mildly accepts his judgment and bends her will to his. Even her name is an implication of purity, as Virginia is a derivative of virgin. While we see Virginia as the perfect wife, she does not inspire passion in Robert. As Robert reflects back to the time after Virginia died from the plague, his feelings are calm as opposed to fiery: two day since he buried her, two eyes,“two lips touching, two hands on the bed…everything in the world seemed suddenly to have dropped into a pit of duality, a victim to a system of twos.” This is the duality of women: sensuous versus pure, emotion versus logic, good versus evil. Women represent the superstitious side of man which must give way to logical thinking and order. The conflict between these opposing forces is reinforced when Robert goes to the library and considers the lonely life of the spinster librarian, “never knowing the fierce joy and attended comfort of a loved one’s embrace, to sink into that hideous coma… all without knowing what it was to love and be loved. That was a tragedy more terrible than being a vampire.” Notice the duality is carried forward in this scene with the opposing ideas of “fierce” and “joy” linked in a phrase, but it lacks the sensuality that Robert feels when a female vampire blocks his view through the keyhole of the door and lifts up her skirts. “In the first second of it he felt that terrible heat drudging up from his loins like something ravenous.” This “terrible heat” is associated with the dangerous, “ravenous” sexual arousal which is far different from the“attended comfort” he felt with his wife and, as such, must be controlled and killed. Even Robert admits that he only kills the female vampires during his daytime hunting trips. It is only the females that he captures and on which he experiments. Robert also admits that all the female vampires have started looking like his daughter to him, so perhaps killing them is a fitting punishment in his eyes. These hot and ravenous female vampires now represent not only lustful sex, but incestuous sex which must be stamped out.

Women as Competitors for Jobs

As the climax of the book approaches, Robert realizes that “sex was quickly losing its meaning without the endless prodding of mass hypnosis. Loneliness he still felt.” So by the time Robert catches Ruth, the “living vampire”, he has disassociated himself from desire. Even though he notices that Ruth has the body of a young girl and he watches her breast and thighs as she struggles, he also realizes that he is not sexually attracted to her. Ironically, when he stands close to Ruth and smells her hair and her scent, he pulls away and realizes he dislikes the human smell of her. “He was afraid of loving again.” As it turns out, Ruth is a “ranking officer” in the new society of living vampires and was sent to help capture Robert for execution. In the brief scene where Ruth visits Robert in his cell, we see a second reason to fear women. Before the 1950s many men refused to allow their wife to work because it reflected poorly on the man’s ability to support the family. Most jobs also required women to quit once they were married. Yet in the decade before the novel was written, women entered the workforce in non-traditional jobs during World War II. After the war, women were forced to give up the freedom and independence associated with earning better wages in order to return to the home. Many women had difficulty reverting back to the traditional role as the stay-at-home housewife and mother, so there was a dramatic shift in the workforce demographics. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, women of working age represented only 19% of the workforce in 1900. By 1960, shortly after I Am Legend was written, the percentage of women in the workforce grew to 60%. This created greater competition for jobs, so women who chose to work frequently faced criticism and harassment, especially if they worked in non-traditional jobs (i.e. jobs other than nursing, teaching, secretarial positions and child care). We can infer that women during the 1950s were viewed as dangerous to men’s role as head-of-house and bread winner, which is subtly reflected in Ruth’s participation in Robert’s capture and execution. In her position as a “ranking officer,” Ruth has helped kill Robert, the last man on earth. Here again we see woman as the destruction of man.

Note that The Last Man on Earth (1964), the movie which most closely resembles the novel, has lost the overt fear of women as sexual beings and competitors for jobs. This is a result of the strict censorship of the period which muffled sexuality. As a result, most of the tension that builds in the novel has been diluted and is ineffective. Women are still depicted in submissive roles, but Ruth’s position as a leader of the new society of living vampires is obliterated.

Women as Saviors of Men

By the 1970s, when Omega Man was filmed, censorship had lightened up. However, the sexual tension and duality which built the theme of science (man) versus superstition (woman) is hampered. The Civil Rights Movement for African-Americans and the Equal Rights Movement for women resulted in a changing film presence for woman and blacks. The role of the surviving women in this film is one of savior and sexual partner. Omega Man features a dramatic scene in which Robert is rescued from the Family by a bold African-American woman, Lisa. Lisa and her friend, Dutch, rush into the midst of the Family on a motorcycle amid explosions of motif cocktail in order to rescue Robert. Lisa is shown as a strong, independent woman who is Robert’s sexual equal. It is Lisa who makes the first move to seduce Robert and, though they are temporarily interrupted by an attack from the Family, they end up in a mutually consenting relationship. The character of Lisa fits into the “strong, black women” stereotype which was apparently more palatable than a “strong, white woman” during this period. Even though she is strong, she “turns” into one of the pigment challenged Family near the end of the movie. She must then be rescued by the white man, Dutch, after Robert has been killed by the Family. In this film men maintain their protective role. Omega Man is not the last man, as implied by the title, for Dutch takes the Robert’s immune-protected blood and the remaining children to the mountains to restart a human society. This lack of human termination makes the title almost meaningless and the stock characters (standard characters that have predictable behaviors), which are also flat (none of them change or grow throughout the story), cause Omega Man to lack the depth of the original novel.

The female survivor, Anna, in the 2007 movie, I Am Legend, with Will Smith, also rescues Robert during an attack by the Dark Seekers. Anna is a portrayed as a soft spoken Hispanic woman. Anna displays the quiet strength and nurturing nature of the customary role for women, so it is not surprising that there is no sexual tension or involvement with Robert. She is rather the voice of hope which Robert has lost. She insists there is a survivors’colony because God told her, reinforcing the traditional idea of women as being motivated by the heart rather than the mind. In I Am Legend (2007), it is the superstition of hope in the personification of Anna which saves humanity. It is hope and listening to her heart which gives Anna the strength to takes a vial Robert’s blood to the survivors’ colony so an anti-virus can be developed. This version of the story has taken the opposite path of the original 1954 novel. In both versions, superstition (women) dominates reason (men); however where originally it killed mankind, now it saves mankind. Even though the characters in I Am Legend (2007) are still stock and flat, the story works as a feel-good movie.

I could be write or I could be wrong.

C.Lynn

I Am Legend: A Comparative Study Part I

I Am Legend, a 1954 novel written by Richard Matheson

Last Man on Earth - In COLOR! Also Includes the Original Black-and-White Version which has been Beautifully Restored and Enhanced!, a 1964 movie staring Boris Karof; written by William F. Leicester, with screenplay by Richard Matheson (as Logan Swanson), Furio M. Monetti, and Ubaldo B. Ragona

The Omega Man [Blu-ray], a 1971 movie staring Charlton Heston; Screenplay by John William Corrington & Joyce Hooper Corrington, based on the novel by Richard Matheson.
I Am Legend [Blu-ray], a 2007 movie staring Will Smith; written by Mark Protosevich, Akiva Goldsman, based on the novel by Richard Matheson.

Part I. See No Evil

In this part of the ongoing analysis of I Am Legend , the 1954 novel written by Richard Matheson, The Last Man on Earth , the 1964 movie starring Boris Karof, The Omega Man , the 1971 movie starring Charlton Heston, and I Am Legend (Widescreen Single-Disc Edition) , the 2007 movie starring Will Smith, we will look at what is shown and what it not shown. This tells us a lot about the movies and the societal attitudes which have shaped each presentation of the story.

One distinction that stands out immediately in the different versions of I Am Legend, is that the 1954 novel, as well as the movies, Last Man on Earth and Omega Man, show corpses on the streets and decaying bodies sprawled in homes and offices. On the hand, I Am Legend, the 2007 movie, does not show any corpses. So, why this crucial difference? Surely in the 21st century we know and understand that a society-destroying plague would result in dead bodies which don’t get buried. We’ve seen this in other plague movies and books, like Stephen King’s novel The Stand, written in 1978, and in the 1994 movie The Stand, each graphically depicts the consequences of a plague which accidentally escapes from a research facility. In this aspect we see an almost squeamishness to the presence of corpses. It is as if we must deny that death has won a battle over us. This attitude goes hand-in-hand with the theme that the humanity’s hubris about our expanding medical research will conquer disease, and eventually conquer death. It is an attitude of “we are knowledgeable and logical, therefore we cannot be beaten by disease,” which prevails throughout the 2007 version as Will Smith’s version of Robert Neville repeatedly says, “I’m not going to let this [disease] happen!” Smith’s version of Robert says, “I’m not going this let this happen. I can fix this,” in the first flashback when he’s evacuating his wife and daughter from Manhattan to escape the krypto virus which has become airborne. He says it again when Anna, one of the plague survivors, wants him to go with her and Ethan to the survivor’s colony. He says, “I’m not leaving. This is ground zero. This is my site. I’m not going to let this happen. I can fix this.” Even in this statement we see, not only the guilt Robert feels, but the denial and contradiction. He says, “I’m not going to let this happen,” yet it has happened. Millions are dead and thousands have been transformed into mindless creatures by the virus. As if realizing his own denial, he follows up by saying, “I can fix this.” This version of Robert shows the complete confidence in medical research that prevails in society. We see this again in the final scene while the “Dark Seekers” are throwing themselves at the glassed wall of the isolation chamber trying to kill Robert, Anna, and Ethan. He yells at them, “I can fix this. I can save you.” Here is the blatant statement that through logical scientific research, all problems can be fixed. And indeed, in the 2007 version, even though Robert still dies, his persistence using the scientific method fixes the problem. The movie ends with Anna and Ethan entering the survivor’s colony with the vaccine that Robert has developed.

Even though genetic theories have been around since before 1858 when Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace jointly announcement of the theory of natural selection, “that members of a population who are better adapted to the environment survive and pass on their traits,” the idea of actual manipulation at the genetic level wasn’t really taken seriously until 1975 when the international conference was held in California urging the adoption of guideline regulating recombinant DNA experimentation. (History of Genetics Timeline) Even then the idea of molecular genetic manipulation was not a real concept to many laymen. It was just the stuff of science fiction. It wasn’t until the sheep, Dolly, was cloned in 1996 that the public began to seriously consider the possible Pandora’s Box that had been opened. The project yielded questions of consequences and moralities which rippled through the general population. Questions about possible side-effects from introducing cloned animals into the food chain and the moral implications of cloning whole humans. Would a cloned person be senient? Have a soul? Have equal rights? Many people thought we had decades to work out the consequences which have been projected by science fiction for years before the actual science existed. However, the Human Genome Project announced its 2003 successful mapping of the human DNA and many of the possible problems associated with manipulating genes came to the forefront. Even though the Human Genome Project offered numerous possible benefits, such as identifying the gene responsible for mental illness, autism, and cancer, the long term consequences were, and indeed are still, feared. We see this clearly in I Am Legend, the 2007 movie.


Another obvious difference in I Am Legend (the movie) is that nature has begun to take over the city. Grass has broken through the payment and is thigh-high; birds flock over a deserted city; deer run in herds through the city streets, and lions have escaped from the local zoo. Neither I Am Legend (the novel), nor Last Man on Earth, nor Omega Man show the decrepitude of civilization. We don’t see any evidence of the inevitable encroachment of nature on a city after three years without maintenance. Why? Even in the 1950s people knew that unattended grass will grow out of control. Yet we don’t see it in the novel, even though Matheson gives detailed descriptions of dust in the library, or the two earlier movie versions of the novel. This shows a lack of respect for the true power of nature. This is a different kind of hubris. It is the hubris of denial, believing that 20th century civilization will be overrun by nature. It is arrogance that, what was built in the 20th century will remain as an epitaph to the men who built it. There is a real irony here because these three versions of the same story are willing to admit to the death of men, as evidenced by the corpses, but are not willing to admit that nature will triumph over their creations, and in the most recent version, they are willing to admit nature’s overpowering growth, but not that bodies will remain unburied from that dead civilization.

I could be write or I could be wrong. Let me know what you think.

I Am Legend: A Comparative Study Introduction

This is a Comparative Study of



  • A 1954 novel written by Richard Matheson


  • A 1964 movie starring Boris Karof ; written by William F. Leicester, with screenplay by Richard Matheson (as Logan Swanson), Furio M. Monetti, and Ubaldo B. Ragona



  • A 1971 movie starring Charlton Heston; Screenplay by John William Corrington & Joyce Hooper Corrington, based on the novel by Richard Matheson.



  • A 2007 movie starring Will Smith; written by Mark Protosevich, Akiva Goldsman, based on the novel by Richard Matheson.

Science fiction and horror have a long-standing history of presenting the truths of their period through the metaphors of fictional and mythical creatures. In this way, science fiction and horror fill the role of the Court Fool seen in many Shakespearean plays, he may tell the King and Courtiers that they are wrong without the fear of retaliation. After all, he is only a Fool and science fiction and horror are only make believe, which doesn’t resemble the real social issues for which they are metaphors. In order to unlock the analogies which these works portray, we must also look at the historical and social context in which they were written. For this third entry into Sci-Fi: Write or Wrong, I have chosen to compare the movies The Last Man on Earth with Boris Karlof (1964), Omega Man starring Charlton Heston (1971), and I Am Legend starring Will Smith (2007), to the 1954 Richard Matheson novel, I Am Legend, on which these movies are based.

This was an ambitious undertaking which I started shortly after Thanksgiving 2010. Here it is March 2011 and I am finally compiling the notes I’ve taken and the research I’ve done to present an analysis of these different versions of the same story. Each one varies slightly according to the societal pressure of their time. They reflect, not only the obvious changes in cinematography, but differing responses to societal fears and attitudes of each period. I have broken this analysis into five parts in order to cover the major points I wish to make. The Introduction below will cover some of the generalities associated with the stories. Part One, “See No Evil”, will address the issue of what is actually shown and not shown in the movies and the novel. “Curing Versus Killing” the infected will be addressed in Part Two. Part Three will cover “Society’s Changing View of Women”, and Part Four will address the basic theme: “Science Versus Superstition” and how each piece poses a different viewpoint.

Introduction

First of all, those of us who love reading must acknowledge that the film version of a novel rarely meets the depth and breadth of the novel itself. The only science fiction movie I can think of which comes close is Pet Cemetery, taken from the novel of the same name by Stephen King. The Last Man on Earth, Omega Man, and I Am Legend series of movies is no different; they do not meet the breadth of Matheson’s novel. The original Matheson novel has 31 Chapters divided into 11 Parts and only the first 21 Chapters deal with the main character and the infected people in the story. Also, the first 21 chapters bear only numbers, whereas the last 10 all have titles pnly. So our comparison between the movies and the original novel will start with those first 21 chapters. We will end with a discussion about the final 10 chapters which are not included in any of the movies.

The basic plot and premise of all four story presentations is the same. Each story begins three years after an epidemic has killed the majority of the people on Earth. Those who were infected but actually survived the disease are transformed into mindless creatures of the night. The protagonist is Robert Neville in all of the stories except Last Man on Earth. In that story he is named Robert Morgan. (Since we are dealing with charters of the same name, I will refer to them by the names of the actors who play the parts.) Robert is the only man immune to the virus. At night he must fight off the creatures who wish to kill him. During the day, Robert tries to find the creatures’ day-time lair in order to either kill them or cure them, while struggling with the loneliness of being the only survival. In each story, Robert ends up discovering other “normal” survivors and during his attempt to escape from the creatures, Robert is killed. These actions are consistent throughout all four stories, but how they are presented and the theme conveyed is different, reflecting attitude changes in society.

Opening Scenes: Setting the Attitude

I am Legend (2007) is the only portrayal of the story which opens with a newscast interview of a scientist who has found a cure for cancer by genetically altering the chicken pox virus. This portion of the opening is brief, but gives us an implication about the virus’ origin. Not only does this fleeting interview give us story background, but it invokes the 21st century fears many layman have about tampering with genetics. The fear: using genetically altered bacteria and viruses outside of a controlled laboratory environment will result in an unpredictable and detrimental mutation of genes, possibly across multiple species. The fear of new discoveries dates back into antiquity. It is the fear that scientific advances will outgrow humanity’s ability to safely use them. It is the fear that man’s hubris will open Pandora’s Box. Part of that hubris is seen in how the reporter admirers the medical researcher and says, “Then you’ve cured cancer,” and the scientists cocks her head and slightly smiles, “Yes, we’ve cured cancer.”We in the 21st century believe that we can rid the planet of the diseases which torment us, and by extension possibly overcome death itself. Part of this belief is based on the fact that in 1969 the World Health Organization announced the official eradication of smallpox, an “ancient scourge” which threatened 60% of the world’s population. Another part comes from the 2003 announcement from the National Human Genome Institute that they had successfully mapped the human gene. We have turned the key to greater understanding of human life and unlocked yet another god-like secret. It is our reassurance that all is right with the world, not because God is in His heaven, but because intelligence, methodical research, and application can overcome all obstacles. So this very brief newscast in the 2007 version of I Am Legend shows us that we have already a reached god-like self-importance that is not displayed in the 1954 novel or either of the other two movie versions.

After the brief newscast, the opening scenes of the three movies are similar. They differ from the novel in that they scan the deserted city using cinematographic techniques available at the time of their filming. Last Man on Earth (1964) uses still flashes of an empty city at sunrise; Omega Man (1971) uses scans taken from the top of skyscrapers, and I Am Legend (2007) uses a bird’s eye view from above the city, and then scans from the side. The novel itself has no preliminary overview of the surroundings; it simply opens with Robert being awakened by the alarm clock. It is interesting to note that the novel I Am Legend and the Boris Karof movie, The Last Man on Earth, basically begin when Robert is awakened in the morning by the alarm clock. Yet both the Will Smith and Charlton Heston version of the same story begins midday and the initial scenes take us to sundown. Since morning is the beginning of the day, we can infer that in the 1950s and 60s the general attitude was that we had all day to work towards a solution to the problems. However, there is a subtle change in attitude by the 1970s. The day is more than halfway over and night is upon us, not only in the theatrical sense, but historical sense. In this one small difference we see the societal feeling that we are running out of the time we need to complete our work in order to prepare for the coming darkness, so we can somehow save ourselves from impending doom in whatever form that might take.

Another interesting difference is that I Am Legend, both the 1954 novel and the 2007 movie, and The Last Man on Earth include a dog, whereas Omega Man does not include any other animals. The absence of any other animal in Omega Man shows a clear distain for the other creatures which occupy our planet. The unstated attitude is that human are the only important creatures on Earth and that what we do, only affects other humans. It is a curious attitude of the 1970s which displays an arrogance of this era. In the three versions which include dogs, we are told that dogs were also affected by the virus, however there is a difference in attitude toward dogs exhibited in these versions. In the 1954 novel and in the movie Last Man on Earth, made in 1964, the dog is a peripheral character living as a wild animal on the streets. Both of these versions reflect the previous generation’s attitude that dogs are merely animals and belong outside. The dogs in these two versions don’t trust Robert, the sole remaining human, yet Robert craves companionship. It takes days, but he eventually cajoles the dog with food in order to coax the animal back into human company. In both cases Robert discovers that the dog is carrying the infection and he must kill the animal. It seems apparent that the dog was right not to trust the human. However by the 2007 version, we see that rats are also affected by the virus. They are still used for experimentation, but then in this version, so are the infected humans. We also see lions which have escaped from the zoo and deer which are free to run in large herds. But perhaps most importantly we see a difference in attitude towards pets. Dogs are portrayed as close human companions. The dog, named Sam, was Robert’s daughter’s puppy before the plague and has been raised in Robert’s house after he has lost his family. Sam is not only companionship for Robert, but an advance guard. Before Robert enters a building, he sends Sam in to investigate. One bark from Sam tells Robert that the building is clear for him to enter. This is a working relationship and, indeed, a friendship between man and dog that is not explored in any other version of the story. Sam rides in the passenger seat with Robert, eats supper his feet and Robert bathes Sam in the bathtub. Also, Robert will not allow Sam to enter his basement laboratory because Sam can still become infected with the virus. Robert and Sam are co-defendant on one another for survival. They protect each other and enjoy leisure moments together as Robert hunts for meat, picks corn, and goes to the local video store. Robert has a running monologue with Sam that shows the closeness of their relationship. When Sam becomes infected with the virus while trying to defend Robert from other infected dogs, Robert tries to cure Sam by using one of his test serums, but it doesn’t work, so Robert must kill her with his bare hands. He is devastated by this. He sits on the floor of his laboratory holding his dead companion and barely holding his tears. He even buries Sam in the field, and then seeks revenge on the creatures who attacked them. This 2007 version shows us a major change in societal attitudes towards pets and other animals. Here we see dogs, not only as trusted co-workers, but as extensions of our family to be loved, cared for, and given respect. Here we see an acknowledgement that what we do effects our entire environment.

I could be write or I could be wrong. Let me know what you think.

District 9: A Reflection of 21st Century Fears



Science fiction has a long history of addressing social issues in the guise of aliens, mutants, cyborgs, etc. and District 9 is no exception. Neill Blomkamp and Terri Tatehell, co-writers of the movie, have chosen the city of Johannesburg for the setting of a "first-contact" event with the aliens, who are nicknamed Prawns. Through this setting, they have drawn an obvious metaphor with the Apartheid's "othering" of the black population in South Africa. The shanties in which the Prawn forced to live, the restrictions on Prawn's movements, and the fear and unease expressed by the human residents of Johannesburg all contribute to the parallels with Apartheid. However, upon closer examination of the film within the light of events during 2009 reveals a more subtle metaphor is occurring.

The Prawn, another name for shrimp or someone small, can be seen to parallel the "little guy" in America, while the MNU Corporation parallels Obama's term as President being accussed of exhibiting Nazi-like characterists by right wing groups. The August 2009 protests against the new health care plan openly compares Obama to Hitler, and thereby using America's underlying fear of Nazism to manipulate voter opinion. I will show how District 9 is a continuation of this pattern by linking similarities between Apartheid to Nazism, then to Obama's presidency.
We will first look at the apparent "othering" of Prawns through the way they are isolated from society. Prawns are forced to live in severe poverty in fenced-in shanty towns which are identical to the isolated districts in which Black Africans were forced to live during Apartheid. The Jews were also forced to live in poverty apart from society in the ghettos during the Nazi regime. During the opening scenes we are introduced Wikus, the main character, as he is being interviewed about his recent promotion within MNU supervising the Prawn "eviction" and relocation to another camp further from Johannesburg. We have the immediate impression that the Prawns are being moved for possible extermination, just as the Jews were moved from their ghettos and toward the Nazi "final solution", extermination. We also have the impression that our main character, Wikus, is being set up as the fall guy for this project. Here in America, the poor also live in extreme poverty in ghettos, though fortunately not locked in those areas. Our faltering economy with its increasing unemployment is helping to move middle class Americans, symbolized by Wikus, to fall into poverty.
Next let's look at the way the Prawns are used by the MNU Corporation. It is important to note that the Prawn did not initiate first contact. They did not land on Earth soil, nor make any hostile motions against humans in this movie. The human security guards from MNU physically cut through the haul of the Prawn space ship, which was simply stationed above the city for a prolonged period of time, and proclaimed that the Prawn "need our help" because they are "sick and starving." At this point it is important to know that in Blomkamp's original short film, "Alive in Joburg", upon which District 9 is based, the aliens actually were violent, aggressors on Earth. They were shown using the body armor with its impressive weapons to attack police and soldiers. This difference in the way Prawns are depicted in District 9 shows a change in the movie's purpose from the original film. It is no longer a first contact film of humans fighting off aggressive aliens. It is humans who are the aggressors. This difference between "Alive in Joburg" and District 9 involves the supposed humanitarian aid which humans think they must give the Prawn. The Apartheid government didn't try to take control of the South African Blacks health for "for their own good." So the metaphor between the Apartheid and MNU doesn't fit for the movie. The Nazis didn't even pretend to want to help the Jews, however they did use the Jewish prisoners for a variety of medical experiments. MNU's version of helping the poor, sick aliens is similar to the Nazis. MNU uses the Prawn in horrific medical experiments so they can learn about their genetics and use the Prawn weapon, which are genetically programmed for Prawn use only. The Prawn, after all are not any more human to the MNU than the Jews were to the Nazis, and they are potentially dangerous.

Now we can tie the American "little guys" who don't have health care back to the Obama administration's Universal Health Care. Obama says we must take care of all those "little guys" who don't have health care because it's our humanitarian duty. This particular comparison of the Nazis to MNU to the American government all wanting to "take care of" the poor, impoverished people touches the fears of many Americans and stirs a rebellion within the independent mind against "being taked care of".

The movie takes the Nazi-MNU comparison one step further to include metaphors to Universal Health Care proposed by President Obama. Wikus represents the everyday man, struggling to get ahead in life and to move up the corporate ladder. His promotion to supervisor of the "eviction" of the Prawn looks good at first glance. Yet during the performance of his duty, Wikus is scratched by a Prawn. His arm appears to become inflected, yet he is actually mutating into a Prawn on a genetic level. We think at first it is either the Prawn's scratch or the unknown alien liquid that he splashes in his face. But eventually we learn that MNU is responsible. MNU, like the Nazis, are performing horrendous experiments not only on live Prawn (i.e. the Jews) in order to gain control of Prawn technology, but also on humans. This tie to science and medicine is purposefully designed to promote fear against Obama's Universal Health Care plan and how it will destroy us on the humanitarian grounds of "helping us", just like the MNU destroys Wikis' and the way the Nazis tried to destroy the Jews with genocide. I think it is also interesting to note that as Wikus mutates, he is becoming that which he hates, the Prawn. In an ironic twist, not uncommon with Twilight Zone: The Movie, prejudice has a consequence: first hand experience from the underdog's point of view.

The final curious metaphor comes from the mouth of the Prawn leader. Wikus seeks out his help while trying to run from MNU. The Prawn tells him that he can help him, but it must have the vial of liquid Wikus took during the eviction. It is the same liquid which Wikus splashed in his own face, and it is the fuel for the space ship. They fight their way to MNU laboratory, which is where they discover the mutalated bodies of many Prawn, and regain the fuel sample. Wikus and the Prawn return to the shanty town and the space shuttle hidden under the Prawn's shanty. Wikus insists on being healed right away, but the Prawn tells him that he can't reverse the mutation process without the right equipment. He must return to his home world, but he will return in three years to "rescue" his people from their torment and then he will convert Wikus back to human at that time. I don't believe this three-year time frame is accidental. The movie was released in August 2009, three years from the date America will be in the throws of another election. The conservative parties can then "rescue" middle-class Americans from the "liberals" at the poles. Now it seems to me that when the Prawn returns he will be kicking some proverbial human ass, so is this metaphor an incitement to violence if the conservatives don't regain control or simply a way to make Americans wait for help, as Wikus does? And by the way, this should also set off alarms in your head because we're back to having someone else "take care of us again". It seems that no one realizes that we Americans, whether in poverty or middle class, are adults and could take of ourselves as long as the political and economic cards aren't staked against us.

Either way, I could be write or I could be wrong.